Showing posts with label conversation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conversation. Show all posts

19 February, 2014

Sixth Week-Term 2

Monday:

In honour of this weekend's Poetry Symposium a friend and I hosted, here is one of the pieces read that night:

Origins and History of Consciousness
(The Dream of a Common Language)

I.

Night-life. Letters, journals, bourbon
sloshed in the glass. Poems crucified on the wall,
dissected, their bird-wings severed
like trophies. No one lives in this room
without living through some kind of crisis.

No one lives in this room
without confronting the whiteness of the wall
behind the poems, planks of books,
photographs of dead heroines.
Without contemplating last and late
the true nature of poetry. The drive
to connect. The dream of a common language.

Thinking of lovers, their bind faith, their
experienced crucifixions,
my envy is not simple. I have dreamed of going to bed
as walking into clear water ringed by a snowy wood
white as cold sheets, thinking, I’ll freeze in there.
My bare feet are numbed already by the snow
but the water
is mild, I sink and float
like a warm amphibious animal
that has broken the net, has run
through fields of snow leaving no print;
this water washes off the scent—

You are clear now
of the hunter, the trapper
the wardens of the mind-

yet the warm animal dreams on
of another animal
swimming under the snow-flecked surface of the pool,
and wakes, and sleeps again.

No one sleeps in this room without
the dream of a common language.

- Adrienne Rich, 1976.

I had a dickens of a time picking just one poem from that night! So I picked the poem about a poem.

The experience of poetry is quite different when read out loud.

Also, played my first round of bells with the other members of the Warwick Bell Ringing Society. I was on bell 4(?). Under Vic's guidance, I started my ringing and before I knew it, the other players had gathered around the other bells and were ringing along. It was so cool. I'm glad I did little beyond just be in the moment.

Tuesday:

No lectures today and tomorrow. One of the interesting things about the lecture structure here is that the term lasts 10 weeks, but the lectures don't. Some last 7 weeks, some 9. Some courses meet once a week, some thrice. The outcome is a slow lecture beginning and end to the term. And might I add, since I'm here, that these are shockingly short terms. I don't, however, think the longer US semesters are any better or worse than the shorter UK terms. It's still a matter of orienting to a schedule and meeting deadlines, regardless.

So here's a true story about a little old lady on a Tuesday afternoon:

In a posh, little English town, where the average age is 65 and coffee shops flavour the soil, a teacher waited with her learners on the street corner. The teacher, tired from a full day of returning pilfered store wears and snatching up hidden joints, stared off in the distance, dreaming of tropical islands and warm briny breezes, and took another long draw off her cigarette. The relaxing smoke swirled around her face then whipped into the air to follow traffic.

"Oy! Teach! Why you smokin', but then say we can't?" This was Kieran, poster boy for the group of rejected learners.

"What are you talking about? You smoke all the time? Since when have you ever done what I ask?" and with that, she took another drag.

*BLURRRM!!*

Everyone, teacher, learners, custodians, and magpies quickly turned in the direction of the blasting horn just in time to see a double-decker city bus barrel on through and nearly side-swipe a little old lady. They looked on with a mixture of awe and horror. It was only for a second, maybe less, but they collectively held their breath for a second more.

After the bus passed, the little old lady looked around for a bit, blinked her tired, wrinkly eyes a few times, took notice of the onlookers and shuffled over. On her short trek she made sure to correct her red scarf, straighten her cashmere shawl, and check the tilt of her Sunday bonnet.

"Did you see that, that my dear?!" she asked the nearest learner.

"I did! I nearly shit me pants!" replied Kieran.

"Me too!" agreed the little old lady.

Wednesday:

Another work in progress...

[Hand in the grinder]

The machine does not think,
The machine performs.
Sometimes, the machine breaks,
And a mechanic is needed.

And sometimes, just sometimes,
The mechanic lacks understanding
Of the machine.
An elbow is carelessly rested,
A lock is poorly secured,
A glance at the most perfectly wrong moment,
In the most perfectly wrong direction.

And the machine whirls again,
The machine performs as required.
With no preamble,
Snatching up the mechanic.

The machine tears flesh,
The mechanic screams.
Nip points reroute tendons,
The mechanic protests.
The machine only works in one direction,
The mechanic can only fight in the other.

The machine will never be reasoned with,
The machine does not think,
The machine only performs.

The mistaken mechanic can only succumb,
To the machine.
Blindly and painfully entwine with the machine.
The mechanic was never meant
To bend that way.



Thursday:

Have you ever heard of the "hedonic treadmill"?
You should, you're chained to it. And you will continue to be until you die.

"Freedom and autonomy are critical to our well-being, and choice is critical to freedom and autonomy. Nonetheless, though modern Americans have more choice than any group of people ever has before, and thus, presumably, more freedom and autonomy, we don't seem to be benefiting from it psychologically."
- Barry Schwartz, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less

With that in mind, the hedonic treadmill helps partially explain Mr. Schwartz's claim why we're failing to psychologically benefit from such desired freedom and autonomy. It seems to be a very human thing to want to be happy, and happiness is unquestionably vital to personal well-being (though difficult to pin down). So we do things to achieve that happiness. We move in some sort of forward progression toward happiness. However, for most of us (and don't think you're so removed that you don't fall into this trap yourself) under most happiness-pursuits, we simultaneously acquire a new concept of 'happiness'.

For each of us, at least one idea has formed about an experience or achievement that will bring more happiness. To date, you've experienced and achieved many things that brought happiness. You laughed, felt elated, smiled uncontrollably, what-have-you, but those initial feelings of happiness didn't last. That joy of achievement didn't last. The initial palpable goodness of the desired experience didn't last. But you've had a taste - or a banquet - of that good thing, and now that *thing* is required to maintain happiness.

Why is that? You were happy before the acquired good, but now you won't be as happy without. That is because you are not progressing forward toward happiness. You are walking a treadmill that gives the illusion of forward progression. This is due to a sick joke innate in humans. We walk toward happiness, but inevitably balance back to a *neutral* state, which feeds the desire for more pursuits of happiness. As we pursue, we equilibrate, as we equilibrate, we pursue. However, we never actually sustain a single forward step.

Sounds awful, but do realise it works in the other direction, as well. Sadness does not last. Pain does not last. The crushing blows of life and living, do not last. We eventually find an equilibrium. Such is the life of a human.

Friday:

Nothing happened other than everything. Enjoy a great song :)


oh yeah, finally successfully chased down my research professor!

02 December, 2013

Ninth Week-Term 1

Monday:

Today I attended my first official Rotary luncheon (District 1060). Terry Bond, my original contact whilst still overseas, was my acting host for the day. Might I say, a lovely group of people, indeed. We dined on soup, bread, sauce-covered delicacies, and jovial conversations. I had the unique privilege of being the only female at the table. The men, all seemingly long-time friends, threw jibes at one another and gave each a 'good ribbing'. I was well entertained.

The speaker was Paul Carvell, Chair of North Warwickshire Chamber of Commerce. He spoke of infrastructure, job prospects, the uniqueness of N. Warwickshire commerce, and the social aspect of their growth (or lack thereof, depending on your perspective). Very intriguing, I must say.

Mr. Carvell said something particularly interesting toward the end which resonated for days... still is, as a matter of fact. He speculated that if The Tube was a city planning proposal for London today, it would probably fail. A feature of London that is so ingrained in the minds of people, a truly wondrous transportation system, that it is near impossible to imagine the metropolis without. Yet, he speculated that, given the mentality of the people today, counter arguments of a fairly rational nature would kill the project in its infancy. "We already have good roads, plenty of cars, taxis, even a bus system. Why do we need to sink more money into a massive project that will tear up neighbourhoods and put people out?" Food for thought...

There were also plenty of attorneys at the table. This set my mind wondering and I became temporarily lost for pondering the traditional attorney tag, "You don't have to answer that." Why is it so important for an attorney to say such a thing? Perhaps it is because we standard, run of the mill humans have a compulsion to answer direct questioning. If so, why do we have such a compulsion? Is this, yet again, some throwback from our childhood? As children, we're [practically] punished if we don't answer a direct question from an adult. I can certainly pull up a number of instances from my own experience. We are taught it is the polite thing to do, after all. And let's not forget, politeness is the cornerstone of a healthy society... blah, blah, blah.

Tuesday:

I was treated to a movie today with two other lovely postgrads from my course. We saw Captain Phillips. Exposé on the movie. On my own, I had no desire to see this movie. I vividly remember the news coverage of this event. I remember the animalistic excitement of Americans replaying the Navy Seal actions against the Somalian pirates. I did not want to suffer another story of murder-turned-American pride. However, my curiosity was peaked after hearing the excited reviews from others. So I attended.

Tom Hanks was everything Tom Hanks is. We wished nothing, but the best for his character, because we did not see Captain Phillips, we saw Tom Hanks.... and we Americans adore Tom Hanks. Yes, I too, like to watch Tom Hanks on screen. So the hero factor was a certain.


But what about the bad guys? We hate Somalian pirates, right? I mean, we revelled in their deaths, after all, when the news came through the wires. 

Oh contraire, mon frère. The four unknowns cast as the pirates were magnificent on the big screen. The directing was superb on their parts. The close-ups and disquieted, piercing glares were all the more shocking on screen, and we loved them. We fell in love with our nemesis and found ourselves lamenting their deaths. We knew it was coming, but we hoped all the same. Their deaths created a shock that washed over the theatre. As can happen with a well told story, we saw the human in the monster, just before the final stroke.


Wednesday:

What is this? It is beautiful, but what is it?
Musicians' compulsion to play together. To bond over a shared language, but it's more than familiarity. It's an excitement. It's finding someone who also speaks your language, but has improved upon it. The Other wants to express those improvements, put it all out on the table. Then you come with your improvements. Spread them out for listening pleasure or pain. A mystery until experienced. The product of a musical cocktail, equal parts compulsion and desire, stirred with pride, and a twist of fear.

"Your language is different from mine."
                                          "It's called harmony."

I woke up today from a fully orchestrated dream. I composed another song while dreaming. Haven't done that in..... I don't know how many years.

Then I promptly fell asleep in another morning lecture. Such is life.

Thursday:


Footnotes from Postgraduate Land:

  • "There's something positive to be said about low investment (education), small return (job)."
  • "The guy in front of us has very impressive ear hair."
  • "It's always about assumptions."
  • "What we now have is a formula for murder."
  • "Look at your suffering. Begin there."
  • "discovery -> knowledge -> power -> control"
  • "Psychology is mostly irrelevant. It's an academic parlour game."
  • "If mechanism is rubbish, what about cyborg science?"
  • "You ever commit a move so familiar you must take pause to revel in the sweet state of familiarity? You should."
  • "I find long-slumbering players privately waking & quietly, insidiously sneaking out. I hope Crazy stays slumbering."


Friday & Saturday:

Decided to give everyone a treat and cook a (semi)traditional Thanksgiving dinner. It was well worth it.


25 November, 2013

Eighth Week-Term 1

Monday:

I keep hearing a clock *tick *tick *tick away. A clock that apparently does not exist. I've looked all over this room, but to no avail. Yet I can feel it. Somewhere, I'm certain, there is a collection of machine-crafted gears, interlocking in a perfect, symbiotic relationship, forcing the smallest of delicate springs to *tick *tick *tick in recursive recoiling. This mysterious spring, this bane of my existence, must be. It must! I can feel it. I can feel a current ripple the air and excite the hair cells of my cochlea as surely as I feel my own increasingly rapid heart beat. But when I search for the source, I am left discontent. I look around at the others in the lounge, but to what end? Even if they were privy to this unceasing pulse, what reaction could I hope for to slake my curiosity?

"Was it possible they heard not? Almighty God! --no, no! They heard! --they suspected! --they knew! --they were making a mockery of my horror!-"

Tuesday:

I and my ilk have passed a threshold. It is no longer within our collective capacity to measure time by hours, minutes, seconds. We cease to exist in a linear progression marked off so succinctly by Greenwich. We have crossed the threshold of known time itself and entered into the Ticktockman's fear-based realm of "Negotiable Delay". We poor, hunched postgrads huddle together, motivated by other-worldly senses and supernatural desires, to negotiate the precise moment when Assessment #3 is officially and unequivocally too late.

Wednesday:

London received snowfall today. Nothing stuck, but it snowed all the same. I was not aware of this. I was aware of the hail falling on me. Hail that, unlike London snow, stuck and stuck and stuck. The one time I found myself wondering along unknown footpaths - in the dark no less - with no relief in sight, it also hailed for the first time this season. In my own way, though, I was relieved. The concept of hail this Texan possesses involves bruising, broken windows, and some element of head trauma. This English "hail" was more along the lines of the slush that comes out of the hand-cranked Snoopy snow cone machines of the 1980s.



Was I upset at this unexpected experience? Not in the least :)
Por qué, you ask? For the simple reason that I was on my way to an equally unexpected dinner party in one of the student housing blocks. That, and also that I have never been packed in ice before. I was packed in ice once I reached the student housing entrance. Now I know what a lobster in the fish market feels like.

Dinner was spectacular. As happens when fabulous people congregate, a simple, generous gesture turned into a full-throttle international fare: quesadillas, guacamole, salsa, refried beans, mexican candy, english sodas, grilled salmon, pizza, thai salad, crisps, peppered steak, cilantro (coriander), honeydew w/ prosciutto, ending in compote topped cheese cake and chia tea straight from India. Espresso was also on the menu, but we all eventually ran out of steam (and tummy space). Mexico, US, Sweden, Thailand, China, Malaysia, and Taiwan were represented at the table.











Thursday:

Today brought the promise of a moment, a single, near instantaneous moment that held the potential to produce anything from a life-altering failure to an unparalleled success. George Loewenstein (Carnegie Mellon University) was the guest speaker at the DR@W Forum. For those readers who don't know, Georgie and I have a past. A twisted, dark, yet sadly brief past.

A couple years ago I applied to his program to earn my PhD while working along side one of the most prolific (if not brilliant) minds of our time in the field of decision making science. Wait, it gets even nerdier. I discovered Loewenstein's work after immersing myself for months in decision science research. My immersion was not for a class. No one expected anything from me. I just simply and quite severely became enthralled with a section of psychology that crossed over into economic & business theory. I loved the effort of a acknowledging the human factor in economic behaviours. I tasted the fruit and it was sweet.

A few days before Loewenstein's talk to our group, I joked that I was going to jump up at the beginning of the Q&A and ask, "Why wasn't I good enough for you 2 years ago!?" I said this as an obvious joke. However, when this afternoon rolled around, nearly everyone I mentioned my joke to showed up to Loewenstein's talk. They had front-row seats to the show. Oh dear....

Loewenstein gave a longer-than-expected talk to a larger-than-expected group. When all was said and done, the students urged and prompted me toward Loewenstein so I could have a heart-to-heart, as it were, with him. At the last second I decided, "What the fuck, let's do this."

I shared my excitement with his work, my previous attempts to join his program, and my present status in Warwick's department. He was naturally taken aback (very interesting), but then committed the same sin as all the rest. He tried to help me understand my rejection from his university's department. Loewenstein suggested that 2nd round applicants have 4.0 GPAs, at least one 800 score on their GRE, stellar letters of recommendation, and it doesn't hurt to have something published or, at the least, in the making. I didn't have the heart to tell him that I had all the boxes ticked. So here, for your reading pleasure, are Loewenstein's pearls of wisdom I was able to glean from our conversation:

1) As of today, the University of Warwick has the best all encompassing behavioural program in the world. Which means, I GOT INTO THE BEST BEHAVIOURAL PROGRAM IN THE WORLD (right now). OK!

2) Professors now, including Loewenstein himself, would not have qualified as graduates for the programs they are now employed in. My interpretation: I'm a better qualified graduate student now than Loewenstein was at my stage 20-odd years ago. OK!

3) Loewenstein can be relied upon to tell a candidate what the probabilities are for acceptance. If you don't cut the mustard, he suggests "casting a broader net."

Before parting, I decided to abstain from asking for a picture with him. Call me crazy, but you don't [practically] insult someone then ask for a photo op.

Friday:

I wonder if these streets will haunt my dreams the way places of my childhood do? So many strange alleyways.

20 September, 2013

I Said What?

It was supposed to rain.

All day.

But it was gone by lunch hour.

So I took a walk.


War Memorial Park

At the current rate, that's $1602.

The only way to walk - unknown garden paths.

Found a hidden gate.

When I returned, I was treated to a lovely homemade dinner by Vicki. She's from the Philippines and I don't know if her dishes were more reflective of the Philippines or England. Either way, it was delicious! Funny thing, the parts she assumed were to be eaten, I didn't eat much of, and the parts she assumed to be ignored, I ate completely.

Stew: pork belly cubes (i.e. 90% fat), onions?, fresh ginger slices, white cabbage chunks.
Rice: white - not instant.
Side: Pork chops in an unidentified yellow sauce - not mustard.
Drink: wine - light dry white to start, sweeter white to finish.
After dinner: small amount of port, hibiscus tea from Texas.

I ate the ginger slices first. For those of you who don't regularly explore ginger root as a seasoning for savory dishes, it is a lovely experience. But more to the point, the ginger in this dish was yellow (not pink like what I'm used to at home) and not the slightest bit spicy. If I bit into a 1inch slice of ginger at home, I would by crying, coughing, and drinking as much water as possible. This yellow ginger had all the taste, no heat. I had to laugh when Vicki saw me eat one. I didn't expect her to wrinkle her nose and act shocked, but everyone else at the table (Colin and their other long-term house guest Davy) didn't act like it was strange. So we talked about ginger for a while.

I did not eat the pork fat..... at first. I was slicing the end meat off (~.1 oz) and eating it with the other stew bits. But then Vicki seamed concerned that I wasn't eating enough, so I ate most of the fat in my  bowl, gobbled down the rice and pork chop, and politely waved off seconds.

I suppose since the table was 3/4 full of world travelers, all 50+, the conversations were all over the place. No one seemed very anxious to leave the table. My favorite type of atmosphere. We watched a major soccer match after dinner (kind of like the NBA's sweet 16), then retired to the kitchen for more conversation and hibiscus tea.

I was having such a lovely time that I refused to take any pictures. Just too lovely being in the moment.

But before sleep could save me, I felt the oppressive sadness of missing my children & husband. I ended up fixating on one of my more common gestures, caressing their cheeks. Lying there, I could just nearly feel the ultra-soft, plump skin of Zoe's & Blake's faces, and the stubble of Jeff's on the palm of my right hand and finger tips.